Incomplete Contracts with Asymmetric Information: Exclusive Versus Optional Remedies
Scholars have been debating for years the comparative advantage of damages and specific performance. Yet, most work has compared a single remedy contract to another single remedy contract. But contract law provides the non-breaching party with a variety of optional remedies to choose from in case of a breach, and parties themselves regularly write contracts which provide such options. In this article, we start filling this gap by studying multi-remedy contracts. Specifically, we compare a contract that grants the non-breaching party an option to choose between liquidated damages and specific performance with an exclusive remedy contract, which restricts the non-breaching party's remedy to liquidated damages only. Copyright 2006, Oxford University Press.
Year of publication: |
2006
|
---|---|
Authors: | Avraham, Ronen ; Liu, Zhiyong |
Published in: |
American Law and Economics Review. - Oxford University Press. - Vol. 8.2006, 3, p. 523-561
|
Publisher: |
Oxford University Press |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Incomplete Contracts with Asymmetric Information: The Option to Enforce
avraham, ronen,
-
Private Information and the Option to Not Sue: A Reevaluation of Contract Remedies
Avraham, Ronen, (2012)
-
Ex ante versus ex post expectation damages
Liu, Zhiyong, (2012)
- More ...