Induced Entry Effects of a $1 for $2 Offset in SSDI Benefits
This paper presents an .audit. of the multistage application and appeal process that the U.S. Social Security Administration (SSA) uses to determine eligibility for disability benefits from the Disability Insurance (DI) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) programs. We use a subset of individuals from the Health and Retirement Study who applied for DI or SSI benefits between 1992 and 1996, to estimate classification error rates under the hypothesis that applicants' self-reported disability status and the SSA's ultimate award decision are noisy but unbiased indicators of a latent .true disability status. indicator. We find that approximately 20% of SSI/DI applicants who are ultimately awarded benefits are not disabled, and that 60% of applicants who were denied benefits are disabled. We also construct an optimal statistical screening rule that results in significantly lower classification error rates than does SSA's current award process.
Year of publication: |
2005-03
|
---|---|
Authors: | Benitez-Silva, Hugo ; Buchinsky, Moshe ; Rust, John |
Institutions: | Economics Department, State University of New York-Stony Brook (SUNY) |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
How Large is the BIas in Self-Reported Disability Status?
Benitez-Silva, Hugo, (1999)
-
Health Status, Insurance, and Expenditures in the Transition from Work to Retirement
Benitez-Silva, Hugo, (2005)
-
How Large are the Classification Errors in the Social Security Disability Award Process?
Benitez-Silva, Hugo, (2005)
- More ...