Inflation Targets and Contracts with Uncertain Central Banker Preferences.
Within a standard model of monetary delegation the authors show that the optimal linear inflation contract performs strictly better than the optimal inflation target when there is uncertainty about the central banker's preferences. The optimal combination of a contract and a target performs best and eliminates the inflation bias and any variability not associated with supply shocks. However, variability due to shocks is enhanced by uncertain central banker preferences. Quadratic contracts are shown to overcome this problem partly, but the advantages of delegation may still be dominated by the 'excess variability' due to shocks. Hence, the credibility-stabilization tradeoff is restored.
Year of publication: |
1998
|
---|---|
Authors: | Beetsma, Roel M W J ; Jensen, Henrik |
Published in: |
Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. - Blackwell Publishing. - Vol. 30.1998, 3, p. 384-403
|
Publisher: |
Blackwell Publishing |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Why Money Talks and Wealth Whispers: Monetary Uncertainty and Mystique: Comment.
Beetsma, Roel M W J, (2003)
-
Measuring Risk Attitudes in a Natural Experiment: Data from the Television Game Show Lingo.
Beetsma, Roel M W J, (2001)
-
Serving the Public Debt: The Role of Expectations: Comment.
Beetsma, Roel M W J, (1996)
- More ...