Is Beta dead? The role of alternative estimation methods
In this paper we test the robustness of the CAPM to two alternative estimation procedures: the Fama and MacBeth (1973) two-step methodology; and the one-step methodology due to Burmeister and McElroy (1988). For the UK stock market we find that we can clearly reject the CAPM when the two-step procedure is used, but find overwhelming support for the CAPM when we use the one-step estimator. Since, in their influential paper, Fama and French (1992) reject the CAPM for the US stock market using a variant of the two-step estimator, we believe that our results for the UK may have important implications for the 'Is Beta dead?' debate
Year of publication: |
1997
|
---|---|
Authors: | Clare, Andrew ; Priestley, Richard ; Thomas, Stephen |
Published in: |
Applied Economics Letters. - Taylor & Francis Journals, ISSN 1350-4851. - Vol. 4.1997, 9, p. 559-562
|
Publisher: |
Taylor & Francis Journals |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
The Robustness of the APT to Alternative Estimators
Clare, Andrew, (1997)
-
Stock return predictability or mismeasured risk?
Clare, Andrew D., (1997)
-
Reports of beta's death are premature : evidence from the UK
Clare, Andrew D., (1998)
- More ...