Is it Free Cash Flow, Tax Savings, or Neither?An Empirical Confirmation of Two Leading Going-private Explanations:The Case of ReLBOs
Firms which 'go private' via a leveraged buyout (LBO) retain the option to 'go public' again, a process known as a reverse LBO transaction. This paper examines the rarer phenomenon of reLBOs; that is, the practice of going private via leveraged buyout, reobtaining public status through a new initial public offering, and then going private a second time. Among the several alternative hypotheses explaining LBOs, we focus on two prominent ones - free cash flow and tax savings - to explain reLBOs. With a sample of 21 reLBO firms, we find no empirical support for the free cash flow hypothesis but detect a significant relationship between the decision to go private for the second time and the tax savings potential of the firm. Copyright Blackwell Publishers Ltd 2002.
Year of publication: |
2002
|
---|---|
Authors: | Kosedag, Arman ; Lane, William R. |
Published in: |
Journal of Business Finance & Accounting. - Wiley Blackwell, ISSN 0306-686X. - Vol. 29.2002, 1&2, p. 257-271
|
Publisher: |
Wiley Blackwell |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Kosedag, Arman, (2002)
-
A test of the impact of Federal Reserve district on bank characteristics
Lane, William R., (1985)
-
Control Preference and Financial Attributes: Founders as CEOs in Small, Publicly Traded Firms
Lane, William R., (1993)
- More ...