Is the Disposition of Constrained Maximization Chosen Rationally?
One of the most important issues in moral philosophy is whether morality can be justified by rationality. The purpose of this study is to examine Gauthier’s moral theory, focusing on the disposition of constrained maximization, which is the main thrust of his project to justify morality rationally. First of all, I shall investigate Gauthier’s assumption and condition for the rationality of the disposition of constrained maximization so as to disclose that the disposition of constrained maximization is not necessarily chosen by rational agents. Then I shall explore his other arguments including ones for the reinterpretation of rationality and the self-critical reflection of rational beings, which can be considered as his further efforts to make the disposition of constrained maximization a rational choice. By exploring them, I shall attempt to indicate that those arguments are not valid so long as he clings to the maximizing conception of rationality and thereby this conception of rationality itself is not enough to provide morality with a basis. Copyright Springer 2005
Year of publication: |
2005
|
---|---|
Authors: | Roh, Young-Ran |
Published in: |
Theory and Decision. - Springer. - Vol. 59.2005, 1, p. 19-41
|
Publisher: |
Springer |
Subject: | morality | rationality | the disposition of constrained maximization | utility-maximization | translucency | cooperative interaction | minimax relative concession | self-critical reflection |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by subject
-
Public sector transparency and accountability : making it happen
Bertók, János, (2002)
-
Dispute Resolution Neutrals' Ethical Obligation to Support Measured Transparency
Welsh, Nancy, (2019)
-
The complex world of control : integration of ethics and uses of control
Radtke, Robin R., (2016)
- More ...