Journal evaluation methodologies: A balanced response

This article continues the debate into journal evaluation methodologies and into the publishing patterns of UK academics. The strengths and weaknesses of both citation index studies and peer review studies are evaluated. Both methodologies are argued to be useful in evaluating journal quality. Networking and journal content are posited as barriers to UK academics publishing in the US.

MoreLess

Year of publication:	1996
Authors:	Jones, M. J. ; Brinn, T. ; Pendlebury, M.
Published in:	Omega. - Elsevier, ISSN 0305-0483. - Vol. 24.1996, 5, p. 607-612
Publisher:	Elsevier
Keywords:	academic networking citation studies peer review publishing patterns

More details

Type of publication:	Article
Source:	RePEc - Research Papers in Economics

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005445436