Knowledge transfer in project reviews: the effect of self-justification bias and moral hazard
In this study, we examine two factors that impact managers' willingness to share private information during the project review stage of capital budgeting. Drawing on the cognitive dissonance theory and the agency theory, we find that both high perceived personal responsibility and the use of project reviews for performance evaluation result in a greater tendency for managers to withhold negative private information. However, we do not find an interaction between these two factors. Our study makes a contribution to both the academic literature investigating factors affecting project reviews and the practitioner literature looking at design and implementation of effective project reviews. Copyright (c) The Authors. Journal compilation (c) 2009 AFAANZ.
Year of publication: |
2009
|
---|---|
Authors: | Cheng, Mandy M. ; Schulz, Axel K-D ; Booth, Peter |
Published in: |
Accounting and Finance. - Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand - AFAANZ, ISSN 0810-5391. - Vol. 49.2009, 1, p. 75-93
|
Publisher: |
Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand - AFAANZ |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
The Effects of Hurdle Rates on the Level of Escalation of Commitment in Capital Budgeting
Cheng, Mandy M., (2003)
-
Knowledge transfer in project reviews : the effect of self-justification bias and moral hazard
Cheng, Mandy Man-sum, (2009)
-
Needs Versus Wants : Which Motivates More Effort?
Mitchell, W. Timothy, (2019)
- More ...