Long-Run Implications of Investment-Specific Technological Change.
The role that investment-specific technological change played in generating postwar U.S. growth is investigated here. The premise is that the introduction of new, more efficient capital goods is an important source of productivity change and an attempt is made to disentangle its effects from the more traditional Hicks-neutral form of technological progress. The balanced growth path for the model is characterized and calibrated to U.S. National Income and Product Account data. The quantitative analysis suggests that investment-specific technological change accounts for the major part of growth. Copyright 1997 by American Economic Association.
Year of publication: |
1997
|
---|---|
Authors: | Greenwood, Jeremy ; Hercowitz, Zvi ; Krusell, Per |
Published in: |
American Economic Review. - American Economic Association - AEA. - Vol. 87.1997, 3, p. 342-62
|
Publisher: |
American Economic Association - AEA |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
R&D AND GROWTH: THE MISSING LINK?
Samaniego, Roberto M., (2007)
-
Macroeconomic implications of investment-specific technological change
Greenwood, Jeremy, (1992)
-
The role of investment-specific technological change in the business cycle
Greenwood, Jeremy, (2000)
- More ...