Long-term contracts in the NHS: a solution in search of a problem?
Purchasers and providers in the National Health Service (NHS) are now required to move from annual contracting cycles to longer-term contracts. The benefits are expected to include more efficient investment and improved sharing of financial risk. This paper argues that the economic analysis of longer-term contracts has assumed implicitly that agents operate in the private sector. Once the constraints of the public sector are introduced, the apparent economic benefits of longer-term contracts become doubtful. The paper explores these issues using evidence collected from analysis of the contracts of a sample of Health Authorities and from semi-structured interviews with individuals involved in the contracting process. We conclude that with the property rights and financial structure of the public sector, the move from short- to long-term contracts is unlikely to produce the improvements in performance expected by the government. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Year of publication: |
1999
|
---|---|
Authors: | Dawson, Diane ; Goddard, Maria |
Published in: |
Health Economics. - John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., ISSN 1057-9230. - Vol. 8.1999, 8, p. 709-720
|
Publisher: |
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Improving performance in public hospitals: a role for comparative costs?
Dawson, Diane, (2001)
-
Longer-term agreements for health care services: what will they achieve?
Dawson, Diane, (1998)
-
The NHS plan: an economic perspective
Dawson, Diane, (2001)
- More ...