Making Doha More Developmentally Friendly for Agriculture
"The opportunity to achieve the substantial benefits from the "once-in-a-generation" reduction in the support and protection of the agriculture sector under the Doha Development Agenda appears to be slipping away. The paper outlines a series of factors for the delay in the negotiations. The author contends that if developed countries had been more proactive on a trade and development agenda, then there could have been an agreement reached several months ago. Such a developmentally friendly agenda could involve (i) better Special and Differential Treatment on market access and more flexible market access protection for developing countries, (ii) a binding commitment to increase aid for trade assistance, (iii) more resources to provide human resource capacity building in export marketing in developing countries, (iv) an agreement for the termination of trade distorting domestic support, and (v) revisions to the SPS Agreement to accommodate the concerns of developing countries. A developmentally friendly agreement would likely still allow the majority of the Doha Round gains to be realized by developed countries. The paper also tracks the developments, describes the progress, and reviews the empirical estimates of the expected global impact of the eight-year Doha Round negotiations." Copyright (c) 2010 Canadian Agricultural Economics Society.
Year of publication: |
2010
|
---|---|
Authors: | Huff, H. Bruce |
Published in: |
Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie. - Canadian Agricultural Economics Society - CAES. - Vol. 58.2010, 1, p. 23-35
|
Publisher: |
Canadian Agricultural Economics Society - CAES |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
The changing role of public policy in Canadian agriculture
Huff, H. Bruce, (1997)
-
The changing role of public policy in Canadian agriculture
Huff, H. Bruce, (1997)
-
The OECD trade mandate study : implications for farm policy
Huff, H. Bruce, (1988)
- More ...