Management without theory for the twenty-first century
Purpose: This paper analyses the origin, conceptual underpinnings and consequences of the idea of management theory. It argues that despite claims to incommensurability and except for critical studies authors, management researchers come together in their quest for performativity. The search for theory has condemned management scholars to espouse structural-functional-positivist assumptions. As such, mainstream management theorists assume and promote psychological determinism. Equivocations, ambiguities, tautologies and imprecise language obscure this implication, however, hollowing out management theory of its performative quality. A century after its inception, the quest for management theory has failed. Another avenue for management scholarship exists, one in which management history is a major contributor. Design/methodology/approach: This paper offers a historical and conceptual analysis, relying on relevant philosophy of science scholarship. The object of study is the concept of management theory. Findings: Most commentators on management theory rely on a widespread view (of postmodern lineage) according to which incommensurable management research paradigms exist. Allowance made for critical management studies, this paper argues otherwise, namely, that current management research paradigms are merely variations on a positivist theme. It further contends that mainstream management research has failed in its quest to identify theory, even if the language used to report research findings obfuscates this fact. Research limitations/implications: A notable implication of this paper is that management academics should reconsider what they do and in particular abandon their quest for theory in favour of management history. Originality/value: This paper builds on arguments that philosophers of science and scholars specialising in sociological analysis have long recognised to offer a new thesis on management theory in particular and management academia in general.
Year of publication: |
2018
|
---|---|
Authors: | Joullié, Jean-Etienne |
Published in: |
Journal of Management History. - Emerald, ISSN 1751-1348, ZDB-ID 2020279-9. - Vol. 24.2018, 4 (08.08.), p. 377-395
|
Publisher: |
Emerald |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
“Physics envy” in organisation studies : the case of James G. March
Joullié, Jean-Etienne, (2021)
-
Gould, Anthony M., (2017)
-
The language of executive coaching : a developmental framework
Joullié, Jean-Etienne, (2022)
- More ...