MERGER REVIEWS AND POST-MERGER EVALUATION WITH DEA
Merger reviews is a core business for competition authorities (CA). In this paper I employ linear programming methods to evaluate potential efficiency gains following a merger, against the background of market-side effects (e.g. price increases), which are usually relevant in a CA’s merger assessment. Furthermore, I use an additive model to show that there are circumstances where a merger cannot induce technical efficiency gains, thus limiting the scope for potential welfare gains. I argue that when there is no potential for technical efficiency gains, the CA should consider an outright ban of the proposed merger, because there will be little room for positive effects on market competition and respectively, on consumer welfare.
Year of publication: |
2012
|
---|---|
Authors: | BELU, Constantin |
Published in: |
The USV Annals of Economics and Public Administration. - Facultatea de Ştiinţe Economice şi Administratie Publica, ISSN 2285-3332. - Vol. 12.2012, 2(16), p. 227-233
|
Publisher: |
Facultatea de Ştiinţe Economice şi Administratie Publica |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Belu, Constantin, (2009)
-
Are distance measures effective at measuring efficiency? : DEA meets the vintage model
Belu, Constantin, (2015)
-
PRICING PATTERNS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR COMPETITION POLICY
BELU, Constantin, (2012)
- More ...