Methodical Madness: Technical Analysis and the Irrationality of Exchange-Rate Forecasts.
Substantial empirical research documents that exchange-rate forecasts are not formed rationally. This paper identifies a common technical trading signal, the head-and-shoulders pattern, as a potential source of departures from rationality in exchange-rate forecasts. Forecasts based on this pattern are evaluated for daily dollar exchange rates over 1973 to 1994, using two criteria for rationality: profitability and efficiency. Resulting profits, replicable in real-time, are tested for statistical significance using a bootstrap technique. We find that the rule is profitable, but not efficient, since it is dominated by simpler trading rules.
Year of publication: |
1999
|
---|---|
Authors: | Chang, P H Kevin ; Osler, Carol L |
Published in: |
Economic Journal. - Royal Economic Society - RES, ISSN 1468-0297. - Vol. 109.1999, 458, p. 636-61
|
Publisher: |
Royal Economic Society - RES |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
ERM Realignment Risk and Its Economic Determinants as Reflected in Cross-Rate Options.
Campa, Jose M, (1998)
-
Arbitrage-Based Tests of Target-Zone Credibility: Evidence from ERM Cross-Rate Options.
Campa, Jose Manuel, (1996)
-
Conceptual and Methodological Issues in the Measurement of Capital Flight.
Chang, P H Kevin, (1997)
- More ...