Mid-term Meta Evaluation of IPA Assistance Evaluation Report : Final version

This evaluation covers mainly Component I for which the EC has undertaken interim evaluations covering programming and implementation of IPA assistance as part of the specific regulatory requirement for evaluation and programming needs under this Component. For Components II to V, interim evaluations covering implementation of IPA assistance have not been completed by the time this meta-evaluation was undertaken. For Component II, the metaevaluation has used a recent evaluation on Governance Structures and procedures. For Components III, IV and V the meta-evaluation has used ex-ante evaluations. This has limited the analysis of these three components in the current report to the area of the intervention logic of programming.

MoreLess

Year of publication:	2011-02-22
Institutions:	HTSPE Limited ; Europäische Kommission (contributor)
Subject:	Bewertung \| evaluation \| Entwicklungshilfe \| development aid \| EU \| EU-Beitritt \| joining of the European Union \| Finanzhilfe \| financial assistance \| Grundrecht \| basic right \| Recht \| law \| Reform \| reform \| Südosteuropa \| Southeastern Europe \| Türkei \| Turkey \| Verwaltungsverfahren \| administrative procedure \| Zivilgesellschaft \| civil society

Check Google Scholar |

More access options

In German libraries (KVK)

I need help

Glossary of Acronyms
Executive Summary
Main Report
1. Introduction
1.1. Objectives of the Meta Evaluation
1.2. Approach and Methodology
2. Evaluation, Assessment and Findings
2.1. Assessment of the IPA Intervention Logic (EQ Group 2)
2.1.1. Analysis of Objectives and Indicators
2.1.2. Programming and Needs Assessment
2.1.3. Analysis of Financial Resources
2.1.4. Project Selection
2.1.5. Sequencing and Prioritisation
2.1.6. Alignment with the Beneficiaries’ Strategies
2.1.7. Coordination with Key Donors
2.1.8. Weaknesses of the Current IPA Programming Framework
2.2. Overview and Mapping of Existing Strategies in and Financial Assistance to the IPA Beneficiaries (EQ Groups 1 + 3)
2.2.1. The Existing Strategies in the IPA Beneficiaries
2.2.2. The Process of Implementing the Strategies by the IPA Beneficiaries
2.2.3. The Alignment of EU and Donor Assistance with the Strategies
2.2.4. The Orientation of IPA Programme Support via a Sector Based Approach
2.2.5. The Programming of External Assistance via a Sector Based Approach
2.3. Judgement on the Performance of the IPA 2007-2009(Component I) Programmes (EQ Group 5)
2.3.1. Capacity of the Administrative, Organisational and Monitoring Structures
2.3.2. Relevance, Efficiency and Effectiveness of the on-going Programmes
2.3.3. The Prospects for Impact and Sustainability of the on-going Programmes
3. Conclusions (Lessons Learned) and Recommendations
3.1. The Programming Framework – Improving its Strategic Focus(EQ Group 4)
3.2. On-going IPA (Component I) Assistance – Improving its Performance (EQ Group 6)
List of Annexes
Annex 1: Generalised Sequence of Annual Programming Activities
Annex 2: External Assistance to the IPA Beneficiaries, 2005-2009
Annex 3: List of the Contributory Evaluations Used in Completing the Meta Evaluation
Annex 4: List of Other Documents and Materials Used in Completing the Meta Evaluation
List of Tables
List of figures

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011476706