Monitoring and Assessment Framework for the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing (MAFEIP) Second report on outcome indicators

To refine the initial monitoring framework, and in the absence of reference data, the previous deliverable (MAFEIP First report on outcome indicators) reported on a joint review of several sources of information available up until November 2013 which provided insight into the use of outcome indicators and which were either directly or closely related to the activities undertaken by the EIP on AHA commitments, namely: • The 2012 data that shaped the initial monitoring framework • The data from 71 good practices submitted by EIP on AHA Reference Sites • And the data from good practices of EIP on AHA Action Groups A1, A3, B3 and D4 This deliverable takes the work one step further whilst analysing data that has become available in February-April 2014 through a survey on outcome indicators answered by Action Group commitments. More concretely, for each Action Group we have not just considered the importance or recurrence of each indicator, starting from the common primary indicators, and continuing with the common secondary indicators, but also overlaps between them, so as to determine the share of commitments that are not measuring primary indicators and for which one would have to rely only on secondary indicators. We further checked the relevance of specific secondary indicators according to the survey so as to confirm inclusion or exclusion of these indicators. Finally for the sustainability column, we confirmed through the data from the survey the type of resources used as measured by commitments (as much as this was possible from the very limited data available).