Nature plays with dice - terrorists do not: Allocating resources to counter strategic versus probabilistic risks
Probabilistic uncertainty is caused by "chance", whereas strategic uncertainty is caused by an adverse interested party. Using linear impact functions, the problems of allocating a limited resource to defend sites that face either probabilistic risk or strategic risk are formulated as optimization problems that are solved explicitly. The resulting optimal policies differ - under probabilistic risk, the optimal policy is to focus the investment of resources on priority sites where they yield the highest impact, while under strategic risk, the best policy is to spread the resources so as to decrease the potential damage level of the most vulnerable site(s). Neither solution coincides with the commonly practiced proportionality allocation scheme.
Year of publication: |
2009
|
---|---|
Authors: | Golany, Boaz ; Kaplan, Edward H. ; Marmur, Abraham ; Rothblum, Uriel G. |
Published in: |
European Journal of Operational Research. - Elsevier, ISSN 0377-2217. - Vol. 192.2009, 1, p. 198-208
|
Publisher: |
Elsevier |
Keywords: | Risk analysis Game theory Resource allocation |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Inducing coordination in supply chains through linear reward schemes
Golany, Boaz, (2006)
-
Determining all Nash equilibria in a (bi-linear) inspection game
Deutsch, Yael, (2011)
-
Network Optimization Models for Resource Allocation in Developing Military Countermeasures
Golany, Boaz, (2012)
- More ...