No need for meat as most customers do not leave canteens on Veggie Days
Switching to a diet lower in red meat has the potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Using a unique time series of daily sales data from three German university canteens from 2017 to 2019, we analyse the effects of a monthly Veggie Day in a food-away-from-home context. We find that the temporary ban on meat dishes did not lead to a widespread boycott – as the heated public debates might have suggested. In our setting, a Veggie Day could reduce greenhouse gas emissions by up to 66%. However, especially at the site with a higher share of meat eaters on regular days, up to 22% of customers bypassed the meat-free main dishes on Veggie Days and ate at other on-site alternatives where meat was available. However, total on-site sales did not decrease significantly. Students were less likely to switch to alternatives than staff and guests. A less stringent implementation of a Veggie Day where only beef dishes were removed from the menu, did not result in a significant shift to alternatives but could reduce emissions by up to 51%.
Year of publication: |
2024
|
---|---|
Authors: | Merk, Christine ; Meissner, Leonie P. ; Griesoph, Amelie ; Hoffmann, Stefan ; Schmidt, Ulrich ; Rehdanz, Katrin |
Published in: |
npj Climate Action. - Berlin : Springer Nature, ISSN 2731-9814. - Vol. 3.2024, p. 1-7
|
Publisher: |
Berlin : Springer Nature |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Guess What …?—How Guessed Norms Nudge Climate-Friendly Food Choices in Real-Life Settings
Griesoph, Amelie, (2021)
-
Exploring public perception of solar radiation management
Merk, Christine, (2014)
-
Informed and uninformed opinions on new measures to address climate change
Kniebes, Carola, (2014)
- More ...