Non-expected utility maximizers behave as if expected utility maximizers: An experimental test
We investigate the behaviors of subjects who either do or do not adhere to the expected utility theory using the Becker-DeGroot-Marschak (BDM) method. We directly examine the validity of the expected utility theory in order to distinguish subjects into two groups: those who adhere to the expected utility theory (expected utility maximizers) and those who do not adhere to it (non-expected utility maximizers), and then execute the BDM experiment in the both groups. We find that the differences in the stated prices between the expected and non-expected utility maximizers are not significant. This result implies practical usefulness for the BDM method.
Year of publication: |
2009
|
---|---|
Authors: | Kurata, Hiroshi ; Izawa, Hiroshi ; Okamura, Makoto |
Published in: |
Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics). - Elsevier, ISSN 2214-8043. - Vol. 38.2009, 4, p. 622-629
|
Publisher: |
Elsevier |
Keywords: | BDM method Expected utility theory Reduction axiom Certainty equivalent |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Non-expected utility maximizers behave as if expected utility maximizers : an experimental test
Kurata, Hiroshi, (2009)
-
Location choice, competition, and welfare in non-tradable service FDI
Kurata, Hiroshi, (2009)
-
Market Size and Firm Location in a Service Industry
Kurata, Hiroshi, (2011)
- More ...