Oceans governance and the implementation gap
Plenary sessions of: FAO, UNESCO/IOC, IMO and UNEP approve conventions, agreements, resolutions and action plans for implementation by UN and their member states. The paper reviews marine institutional architectures and policy-making processes of UN agencies, sovereigns states and Regional Indigenous Organizations (RIOs--organizations belonging to member states of a region), to identify why the above instruments are only partially implemented. The World Commission on Oceans report, 1998. Marine Policy 1998; 22(6). Childers and Urquhart, 1994. D. Williams, 1987 were consulted. The paper concludes that a division of responsibilities for implementation of globally agreed to ocean programmes between UN agencies and RIOs could contribute to closing the implementation gap.
Year of publication: |
2003
|
---|---|
Authors: | Hinds, Lennox |
Published in: |
Marine Policy. - Elsevier, ISSN 0308-597X. - Vol. 27.2003, 4, p. 349-356
|
Publisher: |
Elsevier |
Keywords: | Ocean policy Marine institutional architecture Regional organizations Programme implementation |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Oceans governance and the implementation gap
Hinds, Lennox, (2003)
-
Hinds, Lennox, (2001)
-
World marine fisheries , : Management and development problems
Hinds, Lennox, (1992)
- More ...