On inequity aversion: A reply to Binmore and Shaked
In this paper we reply to Binmore and Shaked's criticism of the Fehr-Schmidt model of inequity aversion. We put the theory and their arguments into perspective and show that their criticism is not substantiated. Finally, we briefly comment on the main challenges for future research on social preferences.
Year of publication: |
2010
|
---|---|
Authors: | Fehr, Ernst ; Schmidt, Klaus M. |
Published in: |
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. - Elsevier, ISSN 0167-2681. - Vol. 73.2010, 1, p. 101-108
|
Publisher: |
Elsevier |
Subject: | Experiments Other-regarding preferences Inequity aversion |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Use and abuse of authority: A behavioral foundation of the employment relation
Bartling, Björn, (2012)
-
Fairness and the optimal allocation of ownership rights
Fehr, Ernst, (2005)
-
Contracts, fairness, and incentives
Fehr, Ernst, (2004)
- More ...