On the characterization of liberalism by Samet and Schmeidler
In the model of group identification, Samet and Schmeidler (J Econ Theory 110:213–233, <CitationRef CitationID="CR5">2003</CitationRef>) provide two axiomatic characterizations of the“liberal” decision rule (a person is socially qualified as a member of a collective if and only if he qualifies himself). They impose standard monotonicity, non-degeneracy, and independence axioms, together with either exclusive self-determination (opinions by disqualified persons about qualified persons should not matter) or affirmative self-determination (social decision on who are qualified should coincide with social decision on who should be the qualifiers). Dropping monotonicity (and also non-degeneracy in a result) and considering a more general domain to allow neutral opinions, we characterize a larger family of “self-dependent” rules that share the important feature of liberalism that qualification of i depends only on i’s own opinion about himself or herself. Samet and Schmeidler’s results can be obtained with a weaker set of axioms and with a more general domain condition. Copyright Springer-Verlag 2013
Year of publication: |
2013
|
---|---|
Authors: | Ju, Biung-Ghi |
Published in: |
Social Choice and Welfare. - Springer. - Vol. 40.2013, 2, p. 359-366
|
Publisher: |
Springer |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Manipulation via merging and splitting in claims problems
Ju, Biung-Ghi, (2003)
-
Ju, Biung-Ghi, (2003)
-
Ju, Biung-Ghi, (2005)
- More ...