Open Evaluation : Integrating Users into the Selection of New Product Ideas

Online-Ressource (XXI, 233 p. 22 illus, digital)

Description based upon print version of record

Foreword; Acknowledgements; Overview of Contents; Table of Contents; List of Figures; List of Tables; List of Abbreviations; Part I- INTRODUCING OPEN EVALUATION; 1 The Evaluation Challenge; 2 Defining Open Evaluation; 3 Structure of Thesis; Part II- EXPLORING THE DESIGN OF OPEN EVALUATION; 1 Needs and Objectives of Research.,; 2 A Framework for Open Evaluation; 2.1 Soda-Technical Systems Theory; 2.2 The Socio-Technical System of Open Evaluation; 3 Understanding the Context of Open Eva1uation; 3.1 Defining Innovation Contests; 3.2 Scope and Objective, of Innovation Contests; 3.2.1 Greater Good

3.2.2 Corporate Challenges4 Method and Data; 4.1 Research Approach; 4.2 Research Design; 4.3 Sample; 4.3.1 Types of Innovation Contests providing Open Evaluation; 4.3.2 Organizers of Innovation Contests comprising Open Evaluation; 4.3.3 Key Metrics of Innovation Contests involving Open Evaluation; 5 The Design Elements of Open Evaluation; 5.1 The Input of Open Evaluation; 5.1.1 Area; 5.1.2 Degree of Elaboration; 5.1.3 Visualization; 5.1.4 Solution Space; 5.2 The Task of Open Evaluation; 5.2.1 Instructions; 5.2.2 Action Required; 5.2.3 Impact on Selection; 5.2.4 Type of Selection

5.2.5 Number of Selections5.3 The Technologies of Open Evaluation; 5.3.1 Level of Evaluation; 5.3.2 Type of Evaluation; 5.3.3 Evaluation Method; 5.3.4 Visualization of Evaluation Scale; 5.3.5 Number of Criteria; 5.3.6 Type of Criteria; 5.3.7 Applicability of Jury Criteria; 5.4 Participants of Open Evaluation; 5.4.1 Registration; 5.4.2 Minimum Age; 5.4.3 Geographical Scope; 5.4.4 Educaticnal Background; 5.4.5 Target Group; 5.5 Structure of Open Evaluation; 5.5.1 Location of Evaluation; 5.5.2 Point of Time of Evaluation; 5.5.3 Order of Evaluation; 5.5.4 Evaluation Restrictions

5.5.5 Permanence of Evaluation5.5.6 Incentives for Evaluation; 5.5.7 Structure of Incentives; 5.6 Output of Open Evaluation; 5.6.1 Aggregation Mechanism; 5.6.2 Weighting of Different Criteria; 5.6.3 Disclosure of Aggregation Results; 5.6.4 Representation of Aggregation Results; 6 The Dominant Design of Open Evaluation; 6.1 Dominant Design Configuration; 6.2 Performance of Dominant Design Configuration; 6.3 Summary; Part III- IDENTIFYING OBJECTIVES AND KEY FACTORS INFLUENCING OPEN EVALUATION; 1 Needs and Objectives of Study; 2 Method and Data; 2.1 Research Approach; 2.2 Research Design

2.2.1 Purposeful Sampling2.2.2 Data Collection & Analysis; 2.3 Case Studies; 2.3.1 BMW Motorrad Innovation Contest; 2.3.2 Swirl Smellfighters Contest; 2.3.3 Save our Energy Contest; 2.3.4 Bombardier YouRail Design Contest; 2.3.5 Osram LED Emotionalize Your Light Contest; 2.3.6 Challenge: Future Competition; 2.3.7 Style your Smart Design Contest; 2.3.8 Melilta Lattea Design Contest; 2.3.9 Spar Design your Bag Contest; 3 Objectives of Open Evaluation: The Six E's; 3.1 Open Evaluation Supporting Ideation; 3.1.1 Engaging Participants; 3.1.2 Encouraging Activity; 3.1.3 Enhancing Submission Quality

3.2 Open Evaluation Supporting Selection

10.1007/978-3-8349-4487-0 [DOI]

ECONIS - Online Catalogue of the ZBW