Optimal Tax Deductions for Net Losses Under Private Insurance With an Upper Limit
Kaplow (1992b) shows that governments should not provide a tax deduction for net losses when a private insurance contract is available. However, his findings rest on the assumption that the private insurance is proportional coverage. We find that Kaplow's conclusions may not hold when the private insurance contract contains an upper limit. The findings of our article show that Kaplow's conclusions are sensitive to the assumption that the insurance contract is available in the private market. Copyright The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 2007.
Year of publication: |
2007
|
---|---|
Authors: | Huang, Rachel J. ; Tzeng, Larry Y. |
Published in: |
Journal of Risk & Insurance. - American Risk and Insurance Association - ARIA, ISSN 0022-4367. - Vol. 74.2007, 4, p. 883-893
|
Publisher: |
American Risk and Insurance Association - ARIA |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Hidden regret in insurance markets: Adverse and advantageous selection
Huang, Rachel J., (2008)
-
Government-provided annuities under insolvency risk
Huang, Rachel J., (2008)
-
Stochastic dominance and the demand for insurance
Huang, Rachel J., (2025)
- More ...