Ownership Studies: The Data Source Does Matter
We examine the fit between the ownership data provided by four surrogate databases and the data collected from proxy statements. We discover an unambiguous pecking order among the surrogates relative to the benchmark ownership statistics of corporate proxy statements. Corporate Text is first, followed in descending order by Compact Disclosure, Value Line, and Spectrum. Further tests show that reporting discrepancies in the Value Line and Spectrum databases could affect economic inferences drawn from regressions using their ownership data. A field guide describing each data source's reporting conventions, formats, and strategies for data aggregation may be downloaded from the Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis' web site (http://webenu.washington.edu/~jfqa/hold/andeapdx.pdf).
Year of publication: |
1997
|
---|---|
Authors: | Anderson, Ronald C. ; Lee, D. Scott |
Published in: |
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. - Cambridge University Press. - Vol. 32.1997, 03, p. 311-329
|
Publisher: |
Cambridge University Press |
Description of contents: | Abstract [journals.cambridge.org] |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Ownership studies : the data source does matter
Anderson, Ronald C., (1997)
-
Ownership Studies : The Data Source Does Matter
Anderson, Ronald C., (2012)
-
Management buyout proposals and inside information
Lee, D. Scott, (1992)
- More ...