Participatory research and the race to save the planet: Questions, critique, and lessons from the field
Participation has been widely touted as “the answer” to a number of problems facing sustainable development programs. It is not enough, however, to involve rural people as workers and informants in research and planning endeavors defined by outsiders. A truly collaborative approach will depend upon our ability to broaden our definitions of research and participation, to accommodate a wide spectrum of land users and local knowledge, and to expand our repertoire of research methods. This paper presents a critique of facile approaches to participation, outlines a more inclusive framework for who participates on what terms, and reviews a variety of methods that address the complex realities of rural livelihoods and landscapes. The final section of the paper suggests a multi-institutional model that combines the complementary strengths of several types of organizations in participatory field research and planning. Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994
Year of publication: |
1994
|
---|---|
Authors: | Rocheleau, Dianne |
Published in: |
Agriculture and Human Values. - Springer, ISSN 0889-048X. - Vol. 11.1994, 2, p. 4-25
|
Publisher: |
Springer |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Feminist political ecology : global issues and local experiences
Rocheleau, Dianne, (1996)
-
Gender, environment, and development in Kenya : a grassroots perspective
Thomas-Slayter, Barbara, (1995)
-
Gender, ecology, and the science of survival: Stories and lessons from Kenya
Rocheleau, Dianne, (1991)
- More ...