Penalty and Crime with Lumpy Choices
This paper clarifies an issue in the Hirshleifer and Rasmusen-Tsebelis controversy on the effects of penalties on crime: what is the effect of penalties if the transgression of law has a discrete nature and if the law enforcer cannot act as Stackelberg leader? We differentiate between technical (compliance costs) and institutional (penalties) parameters in the potential transgressor’s payoff’s functions. Depending on the penalty structure, we obtain equilibria either in pure or in mixed strategies. We confirm that the role played by penalties in mixed strategy equilibria is fundamentally different from the role they play in pure strategies. We also identify sufficient conditions for the implementability and uniqueness of given equilibria when there are restrictions on the penalties and/or on the incentive schemes for the law enforcers. Finally, we give a rationalization for the use of mixed strategies as a solution concept in law enforcement games.
Year of publication: |
2004
|
---|---|
Authors: | Franckx, Laurent |
Published in: |
Journal of Theoretical Politics. - Vol. 16.2004, 4, p. 403-421
|
Subject: | economic analysis of law enforcement |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by subject
-
The determinants of cartel duration in Brazil
Silveira, Paulo Burnier da, (2025)
- More ...
Similar items by person
-
Ambient inspections and commitment in environmental enforcement
Franckx, Laurent, (2000)
-
Franckx, Laurent, (2001)
-
Franckx, Laurent, (2002)
- More ...