Pension Schemes and Incentives: Case Studies from Australia and the United Kingdom
The use of selective benefits, directed to those considered most in need, has a high 'poverty reduction efficiency'. But selectivity inevitably produces non-linearities in the budget constraints facing individuals, which may have incentive effects. The design of a tax and transfer scheme requires these two aspects to be carefully balanced. This article considers the issues in the context of means-testing within the Australian and UK State pension schemes. In the Australian case, the main question concerns the incentive to save, while in the UK scheme the 'earnings rule' presents a strong disincentive to work beyond pension age. Copyright 1990 The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research.
Year of publication: |
1990
|
---|---|
Authors: | Creedy, John ; Disney, Richard |
Published in: |
Australian Economic Review. - Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research (MIAESR). - Vol. 23.1990, 1, p. 23-32
|
Publisher: |
Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research (MIAESR) |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Eligibility for unemployment benefits in Great Britain
Creedy, John, (1981)
-
Social insurance in transition : an economic analysis
Creedy, John, (1985)
-
Financing State Pensions in Alternative Pay-as-You-Go Schemes.
Creedy, John, (1992)
- More ...