Performance evaluation and self-designated benchmark indexes in the mutual fund industry
Almost one-third of actively managed, diversified U.S. equity mutual funds specify a size and value/growth benchmark index in the fund prospectus that does not match the fund's actual style. Nevertheless, these "mismatched" benchmarks matter to fund investors. Performance relative to the specified benchmark is a significant determinant of a fund's subsequent cash inflows, even controlling for performance measures that better capture the fund's style. These incremental flows appear unlikely to be rational responses to abnormal returns. The evidence is consistent with the notion that mismatched self-designated benchmarks result from strategic fund behavior driven by the incentive to improve flows.
Year of publication: |
2009
|
---|---|
Authors: | Sensoy, Berk A. |
Published in: |
Journal of Financial Economics. - Elsevier, ISSN 0304-405X. - Vol. 92.2009, 1, p. 25-39
|
Publisher: |
Elsevier |
Keywords: | Mutual funds Performance evaluation Benchmarks Flows Strategic incentives |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Performance evaluation and self-designated benchmark indexes in the mutual fund industry
Sensoy, Berk A., (2009)
-
How much for a haircut? Illiquidity, secondary markets, and the value of private equity
Bollen, Nicolas P. B., (2021)
-
Measuring Institutional Investors’ Skill at Making Private Equity Investments
CAVAGNARO, DANIEL R., (2019)
- More ...