Performance of the ambient tax: does the nature of the damage matter?
The ambient tax is often considered as an effcient instrument to achieve a
rst best outcome of ambient pollution when the regulator is less informed than the polluters. Since the ambient tax was never imple- mented in the
eld, empirical evidence is missing. Available experimental
ndings provide mixed evidence: effciency is higher under external dam- age, i.e. if ambient pollution affects non-polluters (Spraggon, 2002, 2003) than under internal damage, i.e. if ambient pollution a¤ects polluters themselves (Cochard et al., 2005). Since these two types of experiments relied on very different designs, it is worthwhile to compare them under a common experimental design. Our main
nding is that the ambient tax is equally effcient under external damage than under internal damage.
Year of publication: |
2011-12
|
---|---|
Authors: | AMMAR, Nasreddine ; ENNASRI, Ahmed ; Willinger, Marc |
Institutions: | LAboratoire Montpelliérain d'Économie Théorique et Appliquée (LAMETA), Faculté de sciences économiques |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Managerial incentives under competitive pressure: Experimental investigation
Ennasri, Ahmed, (2011)
-
Performance of the Ambient Tax: Does the Nature of the Damage Matter?
Willinger, Marc, (2014)
-
Performance of the ambient tax : does the nature of the damage matter?
Willinger, Marc, (2014)
- More ...