Personality Traits and Subjective Well-Being: Moderating Role of Optimism in University Employees

The present study examined the moderating impact of optimism on the relationship between personality traits (neuroticism and conscientiousness) and subjective well-being (distress and satisfaction with life) among university employees. Participants were 251 (age 25–60) employees at COMSATS University, who completed demographic information sheet, two subscales (neuroticism and conscientiousness) of NEO Personality Inventory (Costa et al. in Br J Psychol 78:299–306, <CitationRef CitationID="CR23">1987</CitationRef>), Life Orientation Test-Revised (Scheier et al. in J Pers Soc Psychol 67:1063–1078, <CitationRef CitationID="CR66">1994</CitationRef>), Satisfaction with Life Scale (Dienere et al. in J Persy Assess 49:71–75, <CitationRef CitationID="CR32">1985</CitationRef>), and two subscales (depression and anxiety) of Brief Symptom Inventory (Derogatis and Melisaratos in Psychol Med 13:595–605, <CitationRef CitationID="CR27">1983</CitationRef>). On a final sample of 251 university employees, a series of moderated hierarchical regression analyses were performed separately for positive and negative health outcomes. Results indicated that optimism moderated between neuroticism and distress and neuroticism and satisfaction with life. Further, optimism moderated between conscientiousness and distress and conscientiousness and satisfaction with life. The current findings have implications for clinicians, researchers, and policy makers for the identification of resource factors that may help to understand the resistant power of non clinical sample to maintain positive functioning. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014