Playing It Safe with Low Conditional Fees versus Being Insured by High Contingent Fees
Under contingent fees the attorney gets a share of the judgment; under conditional fees he gets an upscale premium if the case is won, a premium unrelated, however, to the adjudicated amount. This article compares conditional and contingent fees in a framework where lawyers choose between a safe and a risky litigation strategy. Under conditional fees lawyers prefer the safe strategy; under contingent fess, the risky one. Risk-averse plaintiffs prefer conditional fees over contingent fees when lawyering costs are low and vice-versa for high lawyering costs. Copyright 2006, Oxford University Press.
Year of publication: |
2006
|
---|---|
Authors: | Emons, Winand |
Published in: |
American Law and Economics Review. - Oxford University Press. - Vol. 8.2006, 1, p. 20-32
|
Publisher: |
Oxford University Press |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
[Rezension von: Bester, Helmut, Theorie der Industrieökonomik]
Emons, Winand, (2000)
-
An introduction to the legal and economic theories of torts
Emons, Winand, (1991)
-
More on damage measures, breach of contract, and renegotiation
Emons, Winand, (1989)
- More ...