Preserving or removing special players: What keeps your payoff unchanged in TU-games?
If a player is removed from a game, what keeps the payoff of the remaining players unchanged? Is it the removal of a special player or its presence among the remaining players? This article answers this question in a complement study to Kamijo and Kongo (2012). We introduce axioms of invariance from player deletion in presence of a special player. In particular, if the special player is a nullifying player (resp. dummifying player), then the equal division value (resp. equal surplus division value) is characterized by the associated axiom of invariance plus efficiency and balanced cycle contributions. There is no type of special player from such a combination of axioms that characterizes the Shapley value.
Year of publication: |
2015
|
---|---|
Authors: | Béal, Sylvain ; Rémila, Eric ; Solal, Philippe |
Published in: |
Mathematical Social Sciences. - Elsevier, ISSN 0165-4896. - Vol. 73.2015, C, p. 23-31
|
Publisher: |
Elsevier |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Weighted Component Fairness for Forest Games
Béal, Sylvain, (2009)
-
Average tree solutions and the distribution of Harsanyi dividends
Béal, Sylvain, (2009)
-
Compensations in the Shapley value and the compensation solutions for graph games
Béal, Sylvain, (2010)
- More ...