Repeated interaction and the evolution of preferences for reciprocity
This paper models self-enforcing agreements and the evolution of preferences for reciprocity when all agents are rational, Bayesian optimisers. In this 'indirect' evolutionary model, player types are defined not by their "strategies", but by their "preferences". The paper studies the evolution of a community consisting of 'opportunists', who maximise material payoffs, and 'reciprocators', who prefer joint co-operation to exploiting their opponents. Players are randomly matched to play a finitely repeated Prisoner's Dilemma game. In the "unique" evolutionary equilibrium, the reciprocators co-operate throughout their careers, and the opportunists co-operate up to, but not including, the last stage of their careers. Copyright 2003 Royal Economic Society.
Year of publication: |
2003
|
---|---|
Authors: | Guttman, Joel M. |
Published in: |
Economic Journal. - Royal Economic Society - RES, ISSN 1468-0297. - Vol. 113.2003, 489, p. 631-656
|
Publisher: |
Royal Economic Society - RES |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
On the evolutionary stability of preferences for reciprocity
Guttman, Joel M., (2000)
-
Rational actors, tit-for-tat types, and the evolution of cooperation
Guttman, Joel M., (1995)
-
Matching behavior and collective action : some experimental evidence
Guttman, Joel M., (1986)
- More ...