The present SSRN paper is a ‘presentation’ [of equivalent pdf-pages to the ppt-slides] related to the ‘scientific report’ of the project “Does the Generosity–Creativity–Solidarity Triad Matter on Contemporary Energy Security Inquiries?”. The respective ‘scientific report’ of the project is e-visible at the SSRN-address http://ssrn.com/abstract=4123539.These ‘scientific report’ and ‘presentation’ are dedicated to Professor dr. / Corr._M._acad. Alexandru T. Bogdan– the founder of the Center for Studies and Research on Agrosilvical Biodiversity „Acad. David Davidescu” (CSCBAS), an academic entity within openness to the multi and interdisciplinary dialogue and enlarged areas of specialists’ cooperation; thus, enhancing the knowledge on ‘farm to fork’ biodiversity, traceability, ‘in situ’ sustainable solutions, and the related specialists’ post-graduate academic education. In memoriam.Professor dr. Alexandru T. Bogdan, within his founded entity CSCBAS, was a significant part of the ‘International Consortium Generosity-Creativity-Solidarity’.This Consortium exists and acts within its soon more than 15 years of (re)searching for original and more efficient societal forms. Forms of the representation, solving problems (including the ‘complex decision making’), functionally (re)adapting, and structurally (re)structuring the middle and large scale entities. I.e. systems (synergic, non-entropic, ephemeral dynamically featured entities), non/a/meta-systems (entities within their failure of at least one of the synergic, non-entropic, ephemeral dynamically features) and/or other types of Rational Subject’s aggregates within and beyond our (non-)observable and (non-)theoretized objective/subjective world. There are implicit (self-)generated and/or (contained-)created complex global problems.These types of problems [and their recent past and present appearance] stand up at a critical societal level of human-machine aggregation, and are related to the ‘Natural-Artificial Dualism’ tension, within and/or beyond our humankind’s post-Immanuel Kant and post-Adam Smith (e-)spatial-temporality-causality. The entitled theme of the focused project within these present ‘scientific report’ and ‘presentation’ [focused on Generosity–Creativity–Solidarity Triad and Energy Security] stands in a way apart from the actual tragic context of war in Ukraine, and on war as a broader tragic stance of our humankind. Not to point more on the long-term dramatic COVID-19 pandemic stance. But all these could possibly raise our understanding/explanation on necessary worldwide peace and (pre)internalization of operative actions in front and beyond humankind’s tragedies and dramas. Thus, it seems that a possible necessity for peace could be raise up by previously implying a Generosity–Creativity–Solidarity triad.The Generosity–Creativity–Solidarity triad may and ought to become one of our driving forces capable to aggregate the positive potential of the daring riders of the hardly predictable future – in order to enlarge the possibilities to (re)form possibilities. It may also enhance our chances to better know our own world, both its authentic values and the main causes of failures that have to be temporary if we are determined to survive – as would be resolutive reflected a (post)crisis knot of problems – but on a larger horizon, co-eliciting deeper humankind wisdom and (re)adapted / (re)structured complex entities.Let gain positive-acting answers to the following two questions: Is there a possibility to differentiate an initial knot of complex Global (Post)Crisis problems [including the Contemporary Energy Security Inquiries], sustained by a 2030 – and then 2050 horizon, to gain a desirable nexus of solutions focused on the Generosity–Creativity–Solidarity triad? Does the Generosity–Creativity–Solidarity Triad Matter on Contemporary Energy Security Inquiries?Thus, the present ‘scientific report’ and ‘presentation’ point/recollect on the ‘International Consortium Generosity–Creativity–Solidarity’ (re)searching address for original and more efficient forms of representation, solving problems (including the “complex decision making”), functionally (re)adapting, and structurally (re)structuring the middle and large scale entities. I.e. systems (synergic, non-entropic, ephemeral dynamically featured entities), non/a/meta-systems (entities within their failure of at least one of the synergic, non-entropic, ephemeral dynamically features) and/or other types of Rational Subject’s aggregates within and beyond our (non-)observable and (non-)theoretized objective/subjective world. The ‘International Consortium Generosity-Creativity-Solidarity’ is the site of implementation (by original elaborated studies) for the two original constructs: “Creative_Partnership” and “Spirituality-Biodiversity” – all these by a collaborative publication policy – mainly by co-authorship of the Consortium members’ published studies. The ‘International Consortium Generosity-Creativity-Solidarity’ tries to elicit a dynamic level of co-ordination (the best/dominant knowledge level - beyond the "top" or "down" of the co-ordination levels) / comprising the homogeneity level # heterogeneity level (hol#hel). The hol#hel model would be based on a triadic conceptual set of internalized constructs (C): C1: Natural-Artificial Dualism; C2: (A)symmetry; C3: Interactive Modelling. A possible aggregation of the C1, 2, 3 internalized constructs would elicit the compound construct: ‘Spirituality-Biodiversity / Creative Partnership’. A possible implementation of the C1, 2, 3 internalized constructs would elicit and evolve the frame and thesis within the Generosity-Creativity-Solidarity corpus.The above would support the "subtle world based on subtle indicators" construct, resulting in an emulation inquiry, sparking and sparkling by a "will_can_must_do" quaternary elicitation within the Contemporary World Changes. This is to elicit a Charta - equally addressing the Generosity versus Creativity and Solidarity debate within the Contemporary World Changes paradigm. The Consortium members’ major orientations as "mutual direction /method of research", "thesis integration", “cultural exchange” are expected to add/ to provide, at the initial interdisciplinary framework, a trans/co/cross-disciplinary guideline as regards the profile of the contents.This project (referred by these ‘scientific report’ and ‘presentation’) is a long-term accumulation of (tacit and explicit) knowledge, experience, and communication within and beyond related societal events and consonant periods.This project is a part of the interactive/iterative activities and knowledge-thesaurus of the ‘International Consortium Generosity–Creativity–Solidarity’; at the [e.g.] 2018 stage there are 45 participants (Co-directors and their research teams) from 15 countries. There is a SSRN.com e-publication [e-visible at https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2883654] expanding the data about this International Consortium.The present ‘scientific report’ and ‘presentation’ were accepted and presented as a communication into the scientific context of the ‘National Scientific Interdisciplinary Research-Development Conference’ “Performant Energy Systems, Technologies and Development. Contributions at the Energy Strategy for Romania”; Conference held in Bucharest, Romania, on May 27, 2022. This Conference stands on the auspice of the ‘Knowledge Based Development Foundation/Fundația pentru Dezvoltare Bazată pe Cunoaștere’ - www.fdbc.ro [https://fdbc.ro/evenimente/conferinte/].These present ‘presentation’ of the ‘scientific report’ for the respective project [into the context of this Bucharest, Romania, May 27, 2022 Conference] are related but complementary contenting on an extending Energy-Food approach … [so, beyond a strictly ‘Energy Security’ theme].Keywords: creative partnership, Code of Responsibilities, Energy Security, Energy-Food approach/problems, Generosity–Creativity–Solidarity, global (post)crisis problems, humankind’s wisdom, Information-Knowledge journey, Intentionality Axis, network of researchers, plurality of advance, Rational Subject, Responsibility Labyrinth, Social Complexity, Society and Economy, World-Mind relation
