Response to my critics

Leon Wansleben

Central banking studies continues to consolidate around common foundations, but points of tension and disagreement persist. In this reply, I discuss three such points raised by contributors to this forum. These relate to the concept of infrastructural power, the significance of financial stability policy, and questions of historiography. I also offer some reflections on future directions for the study of central banks.

MoreLess

Year of publication:	2024
Authors:	Wansleben, Leon
Published in:	Finance and society. - Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, ISSN 2059-5999, ZDB-ID 2893795-8. - Vol. 10.2024, 1, p. 82-87
Subject:	central banking \| financialization \| global financial governance \| Welt \| World \| Internationaler Finanzmarkt \| International financial market \| Zentralbank \| Central bank \| Finanzmarktregulierung \| Financial market regulation \| Geldpolitik \| Monetary policy \| Globalisierung \| Globalization \| Bankenregulierung \| Bank regulation \| Finanzkrise \| Financial crisis \| Global Governance \| Global governance \| Kritik \| Criticism

Type of publication:	Article
Type of publication (narrower categories):	Aufsatz in Zeitschrift ; Article in journal
Language:	English
Other identifiers:	10.2218/fas.2023.13 [DOI]
Source:	ECONIS - Online Catalogue of the ZBW

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015339697