Retaliating Against Exchange-Rate Manipulation Under WTO Rules

What legal basis is there for retaliating against China’s exchange-rate policy? This column says that IMF rules are likely inadequate to rule against China, while its policy does not constitute a WTO-punishable export subsidy. It argues that exchange-rate conflicts should be handled by a proposed IMF dispute settlement mechanism, not the WTO

MoreLess

Year of publication:	2011
Authors:	Waibel, Michael
Publisher:	[S.l.] : SSRN
Subject:	WTO-Recht \| WTO law \| Theorie \| Theory \| Welt \| World \| Manipulation \| Wechselkurspolitik \| Exchange rate policy \| Handelskonflikt \| Trade dispute

Extent:	1 Online-Ressource (4 p)
Type of publication:	Book / Working Paper
Language:	English
Notes:	In: THE US-SINO CURRENCY DISPUTE: NEW INSIGHTS FROM ECONOMICS, POLITICS, AND LAW, pp. 133-138, Simon J. Evenett, ed., VoxEu.org and Centre for Economic Policy Research, 2010 Nach Informationen von SSRN wurde die ursprüngliche Fassung des Dokuments April 16, 2010 erstellt
Classification:	E42 - Monetary Systems; Standards; Regimes; Government and the Monetary System ; F40 - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance. General ; F31 - Foreign Exchange
Source:	ECONIS - Online Catalogue of the ZBW

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014187580