Review of Twinning in Turkey : Final report ; In the context of the framework contract on Evaluation and Evaluation-Related Services no. BUDG N°06/PO/01/003/101911

ECORYS has been contracted through the framework contract on Evaluation and Evaluation-related services (BUDG N°06/PO/01/Lot N°3) of DG Budget of the European Commission to prepare a thematic evaluation on the assistance provided by the EC to Turkey through the Twinning instrument. The object of this evaluation report is the Twinning instrument as it has been applied in Turkey in the period 2002 - 2009. In this period, 92 Twinning projects in Turkey were initiated and financed under the Pre-accession assistance and IPA programmes by the European Commission.

MoreLess

Year of publication:	2011-05-23
Authors:	Pot, Ferdinand ; Blomeyer, Roland ; Geveci, Sevil
Institutions:	Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Erweiterung (contributor) ; ECORYS-NEI, Rotterdam (contributor)
Subject:	Binnenmarkt \| domestic market \| Energie \| energy \| EU \| EU-Beitritt \| joining of the European Union \| Fallstudie \| case study \| Finanzwirtschaft \| finance \| Fischerei \| fishery \| Innenpolitik \| domestic policy \| Justiz \| judiciary \| Landwirtschaft \| agriculture \| Nachbarschaftshilfe \| neighborhood help \| Transport \| transportation \| Türkei \| Turkey \| Umwelt \| environment

Check Google Scholar |

More access options

In German libraries (KVK)

I need help

List of Abbreviations
Executive Summary
1 Background of the Evaluation
1.1 Object of the Evaluation
1.2 Objective of the Evaluation
...
1.3 Methodological Framework
...
1.4 Structure of the Report
2 Relevance
2.1 General notes
2.2 Has the underlying strategic rationale and design of Twinning assistance been appropriate for Turkey, at programme/sectoral levels?
2.3 Has Twinning been used in the circumstances foreseen in the Commission’s Twinning Manual?
2.4 Are there certain sectors or Accession Partnership fields in Turkey where Twinning could be an adequate tool but is not used?
2.5 Can synergies be identified between Twinning and other types of EC projects, and/or with projects funded by other donors?
2.6 Is the needs assessment relevant, i.e. are mandatory results precisely defined in the Project Fiches
2.7 Is the interaction between key stakeholders (beneficiary institutions, ECD, DG ELARG) adequate and performing efficiently to ensure successful programming of Twinning?
3 Efficiency
3.1 General notes
3.2 Are inputs/activities being efficiently transferred into the planned outputs?
3.3 Is the selection of twinning (as opposed to any other instrument, i.e.Technical Assistance or Direct Agreements) adequately assessed and justified?
6 Review of Twinning in Turkey: Final Report3.4 Could the same results and impacts be achieved more cost-effectively?
4 Effectiveness
4.1 General notes
4.2 Has the Twinning support under evaluation achieved (or will likely to achieve in the case of ongoing support) the objectives pursued?
4.3 Are quality and quantity of resources allocated by both beneficiary and the Member State/Twinning partner appropriate?
4.4 Is the interaction between key stakeholders adequate and performing effectively to ensure successful implementation of Twinning?
5 Impact
5.1 General notes
...
6. Sustainablity
...
7 Horizontal evaluation questions
...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011476717