Risk aggregation and the efficient selection of joint projects by a consortium
This paper analyzes the impact of risk attitudes on project funding decisions in research consortia. We outline an expected utility framework and show that aggregation of risk reduces risk aversion. We analyze the effects of managerial risk attitudes on the decision making process for R&D investment. We show that when funding research projects, firms should consider projects collectively rather than individually. The pooling of risk among projects can reduce inefficiencies in funding decisions. Furthermore, we show that participation in a consortium can increase efficiency in funding decisions, as the pooling of risk among firms can also alleviate risk aversion.
Year of publication: |
1999
|
---|---|
Authors: | Aloysius, John A. |
Published in: |
Omega. - Elsevier, ISSN 0305-0483. - Vol. 27.1999, 3, p. 389-396
|
Publisher: |
Elsevier |
Keywords: | Risk Risk aggregation Decision analysis Capital budgeting Project selection Efficiency |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Membership in a research consortium : the project selection game
Aloysius, John A., (1999)
-
Rational escalation of costs by playing a sequence of unfavorable gambles : the martingale
Aloysius, John A., (2003)
-
Aloysius, John A., (2005)
- More ...