• 1 Risk Assessment Methodologies for Critical Infrastructures. Setting the scene
  • 1.1 Introduction
  • 1.2 The policy framework in EU and worldwide
  • 1.2.1 The European programme for Critical Infrastructure Protection (EPCIP)
  • 1.2.2 The US Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP)
  • 1.2.3 National Strategy and Action Plan for Critical Infrastructure Protection in Canada
  • 2 State of the art of Risk Assessment methodologies in EU and worldwide
  • 2.1 Criteria for methodology assessment
  • 2.2 Risk Assessment methodologies: Theoretical Background
  • 2.3 Risk Assessment methodologies in EU and worldwide
  • 2.3.1 Better Infrastructure Risk and Resilience (BIRR)
  • 2.3.2 Protection of Critical Infrastructures - Baseline Protection Concept (BMI)
  • 2.3.3 CARVER2
  • 2.3.4 Critical Infrastructure Modelling Simulation (CIMS)
  • 2.3.5 Critical Infrastructure Protection Decision Support System (CIPDSS)
  • 2.3.6 Critical Infrastructure Protection modelling and Analysis (CIPMA)
  • 2.3.7 CommAspen
  • 2.3.8 COUNTERACT
  • 2.3.9 The DECRIS approach
  • 2.3.10 European Risk Assessment and Contingency Planning Methodologies for Interconnected Energy Networks (EURACOM)
  • 2.3.11 Fast Analysis Infrastructure Tool (FAIT)
  • 2.3.12 Multilayer Infrastructure Network (MIN)
  • 2.3.13 Modular Dynamic Model
  • 2.3.14 Agent-Based Laboratory for Economics (N-ABLE)
  • 2.3.15 Net-Centric Effects-based operations MOdel (NEMO)
  • 2.3.16 Network Security Risk Assessment modelling (NSRAM)
  • 2.3.17 RAMCAP-Plus
  • 2.3.18 Risk and Vulnerability analysis (RVA )
  • 2.3.19 Sandia Risk Assessment Methodology
  • 2.3.20 National Infrastructure Protection Plan Risk Management Framework
  • 2.3.21 Risk Management for Critical Infrastructure Sectors (Canada)
  • 2.4 Gap analysis
  • References
  • Summary table of risk assessment methodologies