Sequential dominance and weighted utilitarianism
Ok and Lambert (1999) show that one does not have to be a utilitarian to accept Atkinson and Bourguignon’s (1987) sequential generalized Lorenz dominance criterion, because the latter is also supported by a much wider class of aggregation functions. We take a minimal stance, we show that it suffices to be a weighted utilitarian –with higher weights for the more needy– to accept it. We also discuss some possible extensions.
Year of publication: |
2005-03
|
---|---|
Authors: | Ooghe, Erwin |
Institutions: | Centrum voor Economische Studiën, Faculteit Economie en Bedrijfswetenschappen |
Saved in:
freely available
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Is ELIE a wasteful minimum income scheme?
Ooghe, Erwin, (2008)
-
Decoster, André, (2002)
-
Non-welfare economics and the well-being of phantom agents: an appeal to caution
Capéau, Bart, (2001)
- More ...