Should We Be Using Repeated-Choice Surveys to Value Public Goods?

We question whether RMC surveys satisfy these requirements in three key ways: 1) Is casting multiple votes on a single issue credible? 2) Is there a credible RMC decision rule? And 3) Is the assumption of independence across choice sets credible? We address each of these questions then offer some guidance regarding a reasonable way forward

MoreLess

Year of publication:	2013
Authors:	Petrolia, Daniel R. ; Interis, Matthew G.
Publisher:	[S.l.] : SSRN
Subject:	Öffentliche Güter \| Public goods \| Theorie \| Theory

Extent:	1 Online-Ressource (8 p)
Type of publication:	Book / Working Paper
Language:	English
Notes:	In: Newsletter of the Association of Environmental & Resource Economists (AERE) 33(2): 19-25 Nach Informationen von SSRN wurde die ursprüngliche Fassung des Dokuments November 14, 2013 erstellt
Classification:	Q26 - Recreational Aspects of Natural Resources
Source:	ECONIS - Online Catalogue of the ZBW

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014151747