Single sourcing versus multiple sourcing
We show that in contrast to results in the extant literature, single sourcing may not be the optimal strategy of a buyer facing suppliers with strictly convex costs. As we argue, previous findings relied crucially on the joint assumption that, first, there is only a single buyer and that, second, procurement takes place in an auction organized by the buyer. Relaxing these restrictions, we obtain a richer set of results. In particular, we show that even in the original setting, where suppliers bid, committing to single sourcing is only optimal if the respective buyer controls a sufficiently large fraction of the whole procurement market. Copyright (c)2008, RAND.
| Year of publication: |
2008
|
|---|---|
| Authors: | Inderst, Roman |
| Published in: |
RAND Journal of Economics. - RAND, ISSN 0741-6261. - Vol. 39.2008, 1, p. 199-213
|
| Publisher: |
RAND |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Job protection versus contracts at‐will: trading‐off entrenchment and shirking
Inderst, Roman, (2017)
-
Nonlinear incentives and advisor bias
Inderst, Roman, (2018)
-
Sharing guilt : how better access to information may backfire
Inderst, Roman, (2019)
- More ...