Skewness as an explanation of gambling in cumulative prospect theory
Skewness of return has been suggested as a reason why agents might choose to gamble, ceteris paribus, in cumulative prospect theory (CPT). We investigate the relationship between moments of return in two models where agents choices over uncertain outcomes are determined as in CPT. We illustrate via examples that in CPT theory, as with expected utility theory, propositions that agents have a preference for skewness may be invalid.
Year of publication: |
2009
|
---|---|
Authors: | Law, D. ; Peel, D. A. |
Published in: |
Applied Economics. - Taylor & Francis Journals, ISSN 0003-6846. - Vol. 41.2009, 6, p. 685-689
|
Publisher: |
Taylor & Francis Journals |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Cain, M., (2003)
-
Gambling and nonexpected utility: the perils of the power function
Law, D., (2007)
-
Peel, D. A., (2008)
- More ...