Sorority Rush as a Two-Sided Matching Mechanism.
The history and organization of the membership recruitment process of American sororities is studied. Like entry-level labor markets studied previously, this process experienced failures that led to the adaptation of a centralized matching procedure in which a matching is determined on the basis of preference lists submitted by the agents. Analysis of the rules of the match and of preference lists from twenty-one matches reveals an unstable matching procedure that gives agents incentives to behave strategically. The analysis also shows how the agents act on these incentives and how the resulting strategic behavior has contributed to the longevity of the matching system and to the stability of the resulting matches. Copyright 1991 by American Economic Association.
Year of publication: |
1991
|
---|---|
Authors: | Mongell, Susan ; Roth, Alvin E |
Published in: |
American Economic Review. - American Economic Association - AEA. - Vol. 81.1991, 3, p. 441-64
|
Publisher: |
American Economic Association - AEA |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Risk Aversion in Bargaining: An Experimental Study.
Murnighan, J Keith, (1988)
-
Incentives in Two-Sided Matching with Random Stable Mechanisms.
Roth, Alvin E, (1991)
-
Lets Keep the Con out of Experimental Econ.: A Methodological Note.
Roth, Alvin E, (1994)
- More ...