Spatial planning, devolution, and new planning spaces
In this paper we put forward the case for viewing ‘spatial planning’ as a political resource, one which has been largely supportive of the rollout neoliberal approach of New Labour. Drawing on work on postpolitics, we argue that ironically the progressive credentials of spatial planning in terms of consensus building, policy integration, and the search for ‘win – win – win’ solutions may have helped script out oppositional voices. We then outline how the combination of changes to planning systems, devolution, and local government reform has not generated a ‘double dividend’ of greater planning powers devolving from new territorial administrations to local planning authorities. Instead a more complex process of creating new planning spaces has emerged after devolution. Five types of new planning spaces and spatial practices are identified, including new soft space forms of governance.
Year of publication: |
2010
|
---|---|
Authors: | Allmendinger, Phil ; Haughton, Graham |
Published in: |
Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. - Pion Ltd, London, ISSN 1472-3425. - Vol. 28.2010, 5, p. 803-818
|
Publisher: |
Pion Ltd, London |
Saved in:
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Spatial Planning and the New Localism
Haughton, Graham, (2013)
-
The Evolution and Trajectories of English Spatial Governance: 'Neoliberal' Episodes in Planning
Allmendinger, Phil, (2013)
-
Revisiting … Spatial planning, devolution, and new planning spaces
Allmendinger, Phil, (2013)
- More ...