- PREFACE
- SUMMARY
- ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
- 1. INTRODUCTION
- 1.1. Purpose of the study
- 1.2. Scope of the study
- 1.3. Other recent work in this field
- 2. OVERVIEW OF STUDY APPROACH
- 2.1. Overview of study approach
- 2.2. Limitations of the study
- 3. APPLYING THE DEFINITION OF ACS
- 4. FINDINGS ABOUT ACS AVAILABLE IN MEMBER STATES
- 4.1. Types of ACS reported
- 4.2. Treatment as a main component or condition
- 14.3. Types of treatment available
- 4.4. Introduction dates of ACS
- 4.5. Scope of geographic application
- 4.6. Professionals who offer ACS, professionals delivering ACS and setting in which ACS can be applied
- 4.7. Who pays for the treatment provided under ACS?
- 4.8. Type of offences and offenders for which ACS can be used
- 4.9. Minimum and maximum length of ACS imposed
- 4.10. What happens when offenders do not comply with the conditions of ACS imposed?
- 5. STATISTICS ON THE USE OF ACS
- 5.1. Collecting statistics on ACS
- 5.2. Overview of ACS for which data were provided
- 5.3. Case studies on statistics regarding use in practice
- 6. THEMATIC ANALYSIS OF THE USE OF ACS IN PRACTICE
- 6.1. Frequency of use of ACS in practice
- 6.2. Reasons why ACS were and were not used in practice
- 7. REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL LITERATURE
- 7.1. Scope and objective: updating recently-conducted reviews
- 7.2. Evidence on effectiveness
- 7.3. Effectiveness of ACS in reducing reoffending
- 7.4. Effectiveness of ACS in reducing drug use
- 7.5. Effectiveness of ACS in improving other outcomes
- 7.6. Effectiveness of drug courts
- 7.7. Evidence of factors enhancing the effectiveness of ACS
- 7.8. Limitations and challenges for the evidence base on ACS
Persistent link: https://ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10011799438