- 1 Introduction to the report
- 2 Objectives and scope of the Evaluation and the Impact Assessment Study
- 2.1 Objectives of the Evaluation and the Impact Assessment Study
- 2.2 Scope of the Study
- 3 Evaluation of the Brussels IIa Regulation
- 3.1 Relevance
- 3.1.1 Evolution of the initial problem
- 3.1.2 The relevance of the scope of the Regulation in view of the current needs or problems faced by EU citizens
- 3.2 Coherence
- 3.2.1 Delineation of scope with other EU instruments
- 3.2.2 Interrelationships between the Regulation and relevant Conventions
- 3.2.3 Interrelationship with the Nordic Convention
- 3.3 Effectiveness
- 3.3.1 Achievement of the specific objectives
- 3.3.2 Achievement of the general objectives
- 3.3.3 Challenges and additional measures affecting the application of the Brussels IIa Regulation in the Member States
- 3.4 Efficiency
- 3.4.1 Effects of the Brussels IIa Regulation on the additional costs of the cross - border cases covered by the Regulation compared to domestic proceedings
- 3.4.2 Costs of the Regulation
- 3.4.3 Could the same effects have been achieved at lower costs?
- 3.4.4 Possible simplification of the Regulation
- 3.5 EU added value and utility
- 3.5.1 EU added value
- 3.5.2 Utility
- 3.6 Main conclusions of the evaluation
- 3.6.1 Relevance
- 3.6.2 Coherence
- 3.6.3 Effectiveness
- 3.6.4 Efficiency
- 3.6.5 EU added value and utility
Persistent link: https://ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10011624808