Study on the Transparency of Costs of Civil Judicial Proceedings in the European Union : Final report

Alternative title:	Etude sur la transparence des coûts des procédures judiciaires civiles dans l’Union européenne : RAPPORT FINAL -
Year of publication:	2006
Institutions:	Hoche ; Demolin, Brulard, Barthelemy (Anwälte)
Publisher:	Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz und Inneres
Subject:	EU \| Justizverwaltung \| judicial administration \| Kosten \| costs

Check Google Scholar |

More access options

In German libraries (KVK)

I need help

PART I: METHODOLOGY
1 ASSIGNMENT COLLECTING DATA
1.1 The Research Team in charge of collecting information
1.2 Determination of relevant information to implement Assignment 1
1.2.1 Social and economic perspective
1.2.2 Data collection procedures - Identification and confirmation of data sources
1.2.3 Transparency of costs and reimbursement
1.3 Regulation of the costs of justice
1.3.1 Regulation by category
1.3.2 Type of fee regulation
2 Proceeding fees
2.1 Fees for judicial proceedings
2.1.1 Introduction
2.1.2 Allocation of proceeding fees: the example of Greece
2.1.3 Amount of proceeding fees
2.1.4 How are the fees determined?
2.1.5 Date and means of payment
2.1.6 Exemptions
2.1.7 Simplifying: main objective of the latest reforms
2.2 Appeal fees
2.3 E-justice
2.3.1 Introduction
2.3.2 Online proceedings, not much used
2.3.3 The possibility to communicate with courts via internet is being developed in many Member States
2.3.4 Online consultation of official documents or acts
2.3.5 Claim filing by electronic means
2.3.6 Video-conferencing during hearings
2.3.7 Conclusion
2.4 Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
2.4.1 Introduction
2.4.2 Types of ADR
2.4.3 Recourse to ADR according to the nature of the dispute
2.4.4 Choosing the ADR before the litigation takes place
2.4.5 Determination of the fees
3 LAWYERS’ FEES
3.1 The schedules
3.1.1 The schedules setting a minimum and / or a maximum: Italy and Greece
3.1.2 Schedules fixing part of lawyers’ fees
3.1.3 The rates applicable in where the contract terms remain silent
3.2 Supervision of fees by general rules
3.3 Success fees
3.4 The reimbursement of lawyers’ fees
3.4.1 The fixing of a minimum and / or a maximum based on the financial stake of the litigation: Belgium, Estonia, Lithuania, Slovakia and Latvia
3.4.2 Use of the former schedule of fees: Denmark
3.5 The mandatory representation by a

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009639888