Study on the single asylum procedure 'one-stop shop' against the background of the common European asylum system and the goal of a common asylum procedure
| Year of publication: |
2003
|
|---|---|
| Authors: | Hailbronner, Kay |
| Institutions: | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz und Inneres (contributor) |
| Publisher: |
Amt für Amtliche Veröffentlichungen |
| Subject: | Asylbewerber | person seeking asylum | Asylverfahren | asylum procedure | Flüchtling | refugee | Genfer Konvention | Geneva Convention |
- Executive summary
- Zusammenfassung
- Résumé
- Sintesi
- Part 1. Single asylum procedure
- A. Introduction
- B. Comparative survey
- I. The concept of asylum and subsidiary protection and its procedural implications u0097 the need to grant protection beyond the Geneva Convention
- 1. The emergence of protection schemes beyond the Geneva Convention
- 2. Protection against the background of European harmonisation
- 3. National differences in protection schemes
- 4. The growing importance of humanitarian protection
- II. Types of separate single or combined asylum procedures
- 1. Separate procedures
- 2. All-inclusive single asylum procedures
- 3. Partial single asylum procedures
- 4. Single asylum procedures in non-EU countries
- 5. Summary
- III. Distribution of the grounds for examining protection requests u0097 scope of application of a single procedure ratione materiae
- 1. All-inclusive single asylum procedure
- 2. Partial single procedure
- 3. Criteria for the distribution of competences
- IV. Procedural safeguards to ensure a proper assessment of different protection grounds in a single procedure
- V. Possible connection between a single procedure and the granting of a uniform status
- VI. Administrative and judicial review u0097 problems and trends
- 1. Streamlining administrative and judicial review in single asylum procedures
- 2. Appeal rights in separate procedures
- VII. Institutional arrangements on coordination and cooperation
- VIII. Procedural questions and problems
- IX. Skills required and special needs of vulnerable persons
- X. Historical developments leading to the current approach
- Synoptic tables
- C. Conclusions
- I. General remarks
- II. Advantages of a single procedure
- 1. Facilitation effects for applicants for protection
- 2. Higher efficiency of the procedure
- 3. Deterrence of abusive claims
- 4. Administrative savings
- 5. Promotion of a common European asylum system
- III. Risks and problems
- 1.Wa
Persistent link: https://ebvufind01.dmz1.zbw.eu/10009637478