Study on the single asylum procedure 'one-stop shop' against the background of the common European asylum system and the goal of a common asylum procedure

Year of publication:	2003
Authors:	Hailbronner, Kay
Institutions:	Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz und Inneres (contributor)
Publisher:	Amt für Amtliche Veröffentlichungen
Subject:	Asylbewerber \| person seeking asylum \| Asylverfahren \| asylum procedure \| Flüchtling \| refugee \| Genfer Konvention \| Geneva Convention

Check Google Scholar |

More access options

In libraries world-wide (WorldCat)

In German libraries (KVK)

subito order

I need help

Executive summary
Zusammenfassung
Résumé
Sintesi
Part 1. Single asylum procedure
A. Introduction
B. Comparative survey
I. The concept of asylum and subsidiary protection and its procedural implications u0097 the need to grant protection beyond the Geneva Convention
1. The emergence of protection schemes beyond the Geneva Convention
2. Protection against the background of European harmonisation
3. National differences in protection schemes
4. The growing importance of humanitarian protection
II. Types of separate single or combined asylum procedures
1. Separate procedures
2. All-inclusive single asylum procedures
3. Partial single asylum procedures
4. Single asylum procedures in non-EU countries
5. Summary
III. Distribution of the grounds for examining protection requests u0097 scope of application of a single procedure ratione materiae
1. All-inclusive single asylum procedure
2. Partial single procedure
3. Criteria for the distribution of competences
IV. Procedural safeguards to ensure a proper assessment of different protection grounds in a single procedure
V. Possible connection between a single procedure and the granting of a uniform status
VI. Administrative and judicial review u0097 problems and trends
1. Streamlining administrative and judicial review in single asylum procedures
2. Appeal rights in separate procedures
VII. Institutional arrangements on coordination and cooperation
VIII. Procedural questions and problems
IX. Skills required and special needs of vulnerable persons
X. Historical developments leading to the current approach
Synoptic tables
C. Conclusions
I. General remarks
II. Advantages of a single procedure
1. Facilitation effects for applicants for protection
2. Higher efficiency of the procedure
3. Deterrence of abusive claims
4. Administrative savings
5. Promotion of a common European asylum system
III. Risks and problems
1.Wa

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009637478